Thursday, April 26, 2007

fallacies

Although Wolf makes valid points regarding the negative and unrealistic
perception of women in " The Beauty Myth" , she fails to consider that pornographic "women" rate slighty higher than the blowup dolls circulating for decades. They cannot articulate, voice opinions and are embarrasing to be seen with.
Moreover, there is the issue of censorship, when one discusses pornography, what precisely is the definition? What is considered art was once labeled as pornography. And couples, lovers, and those comfortable in their sexual preferences, whose finger is going to be pointing out the error of their ways... perhaps a government that has always resented the seperation of church and state, like this one and his forefathers.
It is always worthwhile to watch technologies agenda, especially if looking your age means losing your position to a younger women as men never grow old only wiser or some such rot.
However if invasive measures are the only option open to keeping that lucrative incentive, then maybe it is time to retire the position and find something that doesn't require one to stay in the dangerous race of plastic technology. A technology that erases character, real beauty and redefines it
at the expense of the recipient, the client, the payee.
Is it me or does the connsumate botox consumer resemble a fashionable
article once delivered through a specialty catalog?

No comments: